Oh dear...again
The left really are a bunch of humourless, fragile sissies. As The Terminator said "....
My politically incorrect blog. It's not meant to grow, attract readers or even be particularity insightful. It's my place to vent. Given the soft, small minded, venal attitudes of some of those I'll likely be venting at I suppose even on a no readership blog I better watch myself. It seems many politicians, social justice warriors, journalists and certain high profile personalities have nothing better to do with their time than do word searches on their own names!
Oh dear...again
I don't know about the rest of you but for me the last year has been a constant stream of three moronic topics.
Covid 19, Climate Change and the never ending wants and needs of the Rainbow brigade.
Well quite frankly I've had an absolute fucking guts full of the lot of them. All three subjects are being rammed down our throats by sniveling soyboy leftists and feminazis and they can fuck off.
Covid 19
I'm not using your fucking app or taking your untested vaccine, the worlds not dying and never was. Just the same demographics passing on with a flu virus that always have and always will.
Nothing to see here so harden the fuck up you spineless chickenshits and shove your masks and lock downs up your weak flabby arses!
Climate Change
The fucking climate has always changed you pack of socialist wankers and all you're attempting to do is create your socialist one world utopia which of course will be an abject disaster. Not one of you screeching mindless fucking ninny's can provide a single piece of evidence the carbon dioxide is causing the planet to heat up. Not one fucking piece!
So shove your ute taxes, Paris Accord and Emission Trading Schemes up your Commie arse!
The Rainbow Brigade
As for the queers and steers clamoring for men in women's bathrooms and now in their sports you can fuck right off too. I don't give two fucks what you do in your bedroom or who you do it with so long as they are of the age of consent and I'm sick and fucking tired of hearing about it.
I'd tell you to shove your rainbow flags, transgender bathrooms and limp wristed IOC rules up your arse but you fuckers would like it so just fuck off!
Just sit down and shut the fuck up for a while.
FUCK!
Ably assisted by the leftist man hating maggots like Katie Fitzgerald at Newshub with sensational lines like
A Wellington locksmith is in hot water after he allegedly poured water over a homeless woman outside his storeand
Eyewitness Violet Wilson-Baird told Newshub she saw the Courtenay Place Lock Doctor employee dump water on the woman and her belongings in the November 14 incident.However his boss has a different view
"I heard a lot of yelling, a man's voice - 'f**k off, f**k off' and a woman yelling back and telling him to stop and I saw water splashing and the woman was all wet," she said.
"So I saw the first bit of what happened out of the corner of my eye - but I got closer because I couldn't tell if I should intervene, if it was safe and that's when I saw the man take the water and very deliberately pour water all over the woman's bedding."
"He was busy washing windows. He's asked this girl to move who was sitting on the ground, who was begging or what have you," he told Newshub.Now dollars to a dollop of goat poo who do we think might have got wet eh? Hmmm....
"She refused so he's continued washing windows, she's grabbed the bucket of water he's had, he's let that go and she's copped the bulk of the water and then turned around and tried to throw the water at him. He stepped aside and another member of the public who was waiting for some keys got wet."
Violence by women against men receives little attention, yet nearly four decades of research reveals they are also targets of physical abuse. Why the silence? Because the activists' ultimate goal is to tar all men, not just the relatively few perpetrators, as a collective and universally guilty group.This is a long blog article with links to sites but it needs to be considered in the NZ environment too.
When the violence is one-sided … women were the perpetrators about 70% of the time. Men were more likely to be injured in reciprocally violent relationships (25%) than were women when the violence was one-sided (20%). That means both men and women agreed that men were not more responsible than women for intimate partner violence. The findings cannot be explained by men’s being ashamed to admit hitting women, because women agreed with men on this point.
Our findings that half of relationships with violence could be characterised as reciprocally violent are consistent with prior studies. We are surprised to find, however, that among relationships with nonreciprocal violence, women were the perpetrators in a majority of cases, regardless of participant gender. One possible explanation for this, assuming that men and women are equally likely to initiate physical violence, is that men, who are typically larger and stronger, are less likely to retaliate if struck first by their partner. Thus, some men may be following the norm that “men shouldn’t hit women” when struck first by their partner.I've been saying this for years. And its got nothing to do with the premise that "men don't hit women" and everything to do with the prevasive societal fear that men are disproportionately punished by having their children taken away from them by the state.
Asked if she had the ability to lead a government that included the Green Party and New Zealand First, she shot back: "I used to be the president of an international youth organisation that had members from Lebanon, Palestine and Israel. I think I can do this."
Out of Her Depth |
"Nigel King, a real estate agent, was fined $60 for parking on a yellow line outside Ponsonby School in Curran St, and another $40 after he turned around and parked over a driveway across the road.
He said he was in the car the whole time, with the engine running, until his 9-year-old son came out of school.
Seriously?"They have two people there taking photos," he said."If I had tried to park [legally but further away], that would have taken me 10 minutes, and maybe five minutes to get back to the school, so my kid would have been waiting outside for 15 minutes."
People loath barking dogs and they loath insular twats that occupy their only little spot in the world and couldn't give a rats ass about anyone else."We just can't comprehend how someone could do something like that to a dog that's sitting behind a fence not doing anything."He did have quite a good bark on him but all he does is just want to play. He just loves doing stuff with people. If someone came up to the fence he'd just be like 'ooh yay, a pat' because often people would walk past and pat him or something."
Correction: June 16, 2017
An editorial on Thursday about the shooting of Representative Steve Scalise incorrectly stated that a link existed between political rhetoric and the 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords. In fact, no such link was established. The editorial also incorrectly described a map distributed by a political action committee before that shooting. It depicted electoral districts, not individual Democratic lawmakers, beneath stylized cross hairs.
The reply I sent them through their Contact Us button |
"The Huffington Post South Africa has received an onslaught of messages and comments from those angered by the blog, particularly via our email address inviting corrections from our readers. Here is a small sample:1. “I see a correction needs to be made on this article! The entire thing is misogynistic and also racist. If you could clear that up for me, that would be great.”2. “Congrats Huffingtonpost! You are now Officially the most racist website online! It was hard work, but just look at you now! PS Race is a social construct.”3. “Delete this article and fire this self-hating racist.”4. “Here’s a correction. Delete your entire website. You absolute psychopaths.”5. “Lets do an experiment: 1 – copy this article in MS word 2- Hit “Ctrl+R” and replace “White men” with any other group, gender or ethnic background. 3 – Read the article again…Are you offended? If you are, why are you printing this garbage?”6. “This article is racist towards white men. How can you allow this trash on your site? I’ve lost respect for huffpost, sorry, you are no categorized as junk along with the rest of the SJW trash that seems to persist on the internet.”7. “I think your editor meant to place this in the satire section or your local equivalent.” Otherwise – and I say this as a person sympathetic to progressive political causes – I suggest they take a long, hard look in the mirror and ask themselves “What the fuck is wrong with you?”8. “White monopoly? Tell it to the ancient Egyptians, ancient Chinese. Get OVER yourselves. Want more, black folk? WORK HARDER! Come up with your OWN economic system. Stop the “mouth crap” and build a better FvKKinq mousetrap.”9. “Suck my balls. The world owes you nothing.”And that’s not the worst of it. We’ve excluded the overtly racist, sexist and violent comments that are quickly gathering in our inboxes.Garland’s underlying analysis about the uneven distribution of wealth and power in the world is pretty standard for feminist theory. It has been espoused in many different ways by feminist writers and theorists for decades now. In that sense, there was nothing in the article that should have shocked or surprised anybody (or so we thought.)It would appear that perhaps much of the outcry derives from a very poor reading of the article — or perhaps none at all. Dismantling the patriarchal systems that have brought us to where we are today, a world where power is wielded to dangerous and destructive ends by men, and in particular white men, necessarily means a loss of power to those who hold it. A loss of oppressive power. Those who have held undue power granted to them by patriarchy must lose it for us to be truly equal. This seems blindingly obvious to us…"