Saturday, 23 March 2019

Oh Dear. I've offended Martyn



My Twitter account is "suspended" [meaning banned for all time as opposed to what suspended actually means] but I can still see replies to me if you know how.



This is rather funny as I never ever once participated in any rumours about the twat in question.


But whatever, bring it fat boy!


Wednesday, 16 January 2019

I'll never buy Gillette again-EVER

After this load of shit was released Gillette will never feature on my shopping list again and neither will Proctor & Gamble.

Some fag or female exec probably thinks the little women does the shopping so he will take what he's given.
Newsflash bitches. She still does the shopping with his money and he bloody well doesn't have to accept this crap.

Fuck right off Gillette.
Welcome to my bathroom Schick.




Pissweasel @River of Saints

Abuses people on Twitter, deletes his abusive tweets then runs to Twitter to have them banned when they respond.
What a gutless worm.

This tard claims to be helping organize the protests against the UN migration signing. If he is he's probably the halfwit that sent Tweets and posts out with the wrong email to join. 
Useless little bitch.

@River of Saints you are the cockbiter of the week snowflake.

Slimy weasel even bragging about it eh?
UPDATE: But wait. What's this I've been sent?
Interesting. This angry twat is a hardcore Commie. That you @River of Saints? Sounds like you.







Friday, 30 November 2018

The 12 days of Christmas

Video's to funny not to post...



And certainly not in October. Fucking retail chain stores.

Wednesday, 21 November 2018

Another liberal trying to cost a man his job fails_Lock Doctor stands by their man

Ably assisted by the leftist man hating maggots like Katie Fitzgerald at Newshub with sensational lines like
A Wellington locksmith is in hot water after he allegedly poured water over a homeless woman outside his store
and
Eyewitness Violet Wilson-Baird told Newshub she saw the Courtenay Place Lock Doctor employee dump water on the woman and her belongings in the November 14 incident.
"I heard a lot of yelling, a man's voice - 'f**k off, f**k off' and a woman yelling back and telling him to stop and I saw water splashing and the woman was all wet," she said.
"So I saw the first bit of what happened out of the corner of my eye - but I got closer because I couldn't tell if I should intervene, if it was safe and that's when I saw the man take the water and very deliberately pour water all over the woman's bedding."
However his boss has a different view
"He was busy washing windows. He's asked this girl to move who was sitting on the ground, who was begging or what have you," he told Newshub.
"She refused so he's continued washing windows, she's grabbed the bucket of water he's had, he's let that go and she's copped the bulk of the water and then turned around and tried to throw the water at him. He stepped aside and another member of the public who was waiting for some keys got wet."
Now dollars to a dollop of goat poo who do we think might have got wet eh? Hmmm....

Add to that it seems Ms Violet Wilson-Baird is another one of those people with an axe to grind and a cause. A quick name search provides this

Why would a bleeding heart site that is a registered NZ charity have all of @violetmadeline activity suddenly wiped 7 hours and 44mins ago. Wonder who Violet works for hmmm?

And of course there's her liberal Twitter account and a screen shot just so she can't run away from it..

Now having to deal with a lot of so called homeless people that hang out on K Road I've no doubt the employees version is true enough and that low achievers like violet just see an opportunity to get their 5 minutes of fame by throwing a man under the bus.

Big ups to his employer for having the nuts to speak up and lets hope they have a security cam to catch the swine that sabotaged their equipment.

Wellingtonian's that care about their freedoms should be supporting the Lock Doctor. Not that there's many of you that do.

Sunday, 14 October 2018

Domestic Abuse by Women on men

Because NZ will not admit the same exists here. Domestic Abuse by Women against men is well known in NZ by the social agencies to run at 50% of all domestic violence.
The police hide it at every opportunity.

Seems Aussie has a similar problem but at least it's being discussed.

Violence by women against men receives little attention, yet nearly four decades of research reveals they are also targets of physical abuse. Why the silence? Because the activists' ultimate goal is to tar all men, not just the relatively few perpetrators, as a collective and universally guilty group.
This is a long blog article with links to sites but it needs to be considered in the NZ environment too.
When the violence is one-sided … women were the perpetrators about 70% of the time. Men were more likely to be injured in reciprocally violent relationships (25%) than were women when the violence was one-sided (20%). That means both men and women agreed that men were not more responsible than women for intimate partner violence. The findings cannot be explained by men’s being ashamed to admit hitting women, because women agreed with men on this point.

Our findings that half of relationships with violence could be characterised as reciprocally violent are consistent with prior studies. We are surprised to find, however, that among relationships with nonreciprocal violence, women were the perpetrators in a majority of cases, regardless of participant gender. One possible explanation for this, assuming that men and women are equally likely to initiate physical violence, is that men, who are typically larger and stronger, are less likely to retaliate if struck first by their partner. Thus, some men may be following the norm that “men shouldn’t hit women” when struck first by their partner.
I've been saying this for years. And its got nothing to do with the premise that "men don't hit women" and everything to do with the prevasive societal fear that men are disproportionately punished by having their children taken away from them by the state. 

I wonder when the likes of Golriz Gharahmin will be prepared to speak up on behalf of men?

And he laffed and he laffed and he laffed!

Wednesday, 26 September 2018

The truth about Golriz Ghahraman.

This article has been plagiarized. I'm fully aware of who the author is and will remove at his request but nobody else.
It was sent to me by somebody that does not want it lost even though the author was forced to remove it from the internet due to bullying by a social media giant and a lying MP. 
I've made some changes to formatting and tried to fix some links. Some links repeat but as I've never seen the original I've assumed that was the authors intent. One link no longer works so I've removed it and just left the sentence. 
 
GOLRIZ GHAHRAMAN, GREEN PARTY NEW ZEALAND MP  
13 August 2018
The Green Party MP, Golriz Ghahraman, came to my attention on 3 August 2018 after she posted a video on Twitter saying, “No human right is absolute. They are all subject to lawful limits.” I responded that in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, there are many human rights which are absolute, such as the right not to be tortured or suffer cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. She blocked me on Twitter.
Ms Ghahraman’s Green Party profile states, “Golriz is an Iranian-Kiwi refugee, lucky to escape war and persecution as a child” and “Golriz made history as the first ever refugee to be sworn in as an MP”.
In a NZ Herald article, 7 October 2017, Kirsty Johnston writes, “Most of Golriz Ghahraman's childhood memories are of war. She remembers howling sirens, sending families scurrying into basements. She remembers people being trapped.”
In her Maiden Speech to Parliament Ms Ghahraman said, “I remember the bombs and the sirens, running to a basement and just waiting. But mostly I remember kids my age who stopped talking from the shell shock, and I still don't know what happened to them.” 
Ms Ghahraman stated in June 2017, that “I’m from Mashhad in the north of Iran”. She is also reported to have claimed that when departing Iran, they left from Mashhad. She was proud of her city and claimed that since Mosul in northern Iraq had been destroyed, it was the most important “holy city” for the Shi’a. This claim is incorrect because the most important Shi’a cities have always been Najaf with the shrine of Imam Ali, and Karbala with the shrine of Imam Hussein. In the order of revered Shi’a holy men, Ali is the first Imam, Hussein is the third and Mashhad has the shrine for Imam Reza, lower down the list as the fifth Imam of the 12 Imams.
The significance of Ms Ghahraman’s statement is that she has an affinity with Mashhad, which indicates she was living there and not in Tehran.
Mashhad is the largest city in eastern Iran, near the border with Afghanistan. It was unaffected by the war, except as a safe haven for many people displaced by the Iran-Iraq war in the west and south. There were no missiles attacks. It is 900 km east of Tehran and 1500km from Iraq, well out of Iraqi rocket range. If she was always living in Mashhad until 1990, the claim of war memories is fictional.
In answer to the concerns raised about her living in Mashhad, Ms Ghahraman is reported to have claimed that she went to Tehran in the school holidays, so in 1987 or 1988, but does not give specific dates. Between June and September 1988, there had been missile attacks on Tehran between March to May 1988 and it is implaisible that she would have gone there for the school holidays. That only leaves 1987 when aged 6 years. This also lacks the ring of truth because it does not explain why she would be taken to Tehran, within possible range of bombing/missile attacks, instead of remaining in the safety of Mashhad.
There is no record in published information I have seen that Ms Ghahraman and her family moved from Mashhad to Tehran. There are reports of some bombing raids on Tehran by Iraq's depleted airforce after 1984 but nothing of the damage done to other cities closer to the border. Iran's airforce was one of the most modern in the Middle East, with the Shah having squandered the nation's oil wealth on building up the armed forces, having been allowed to purchase modern US fighters. However, if the claim about her memory of missile attacks is true, her family would have had to have moved to Tehran by the first attack in mid March 1988.
In a 52 day period during March to May 1988, Tehran was attacked by Iraqi missiles and 86 landed in populated areas. Some 422 civilians died and 1579 were injured. As noted earlier, it appears on the evidence of Ms Ghahraman that she never lived in Tehran. 
In an online article, 5 August2017, she says, “I had this lovely, happy childhood in the middle of what was a really insecure political time in Iran's history.” There is no reference to missiles, sirens, or trapped people. This inconsistent statement casts further doubt on whether she was ever affected by the war between Iran and Iraq from 1980 to 1988.
The claim that Ms Ghahraman was so traumatised by events over 52 days in an 8-year war when she was 6 or 7 years old, giving the impression to Kirsty Johnston of the NZ Herald that “most” of her “childhood memories are of war” is not consistent with the facts.
There is no recorded evidence I have seen that Ms Ghahraman has given the name of the suburb where she lived in Tehran, if she indeed ever lived there, which could confirm whether she was anywhere near one of the 86 missiles that landed in Tehran. Ms Ghahraman has given vague information about this claim, while at the same time indicating a strong connection with Mashhad, which further casts doubt on whether her family moved from Mashhad to Tehran and was she was exposed to any rocket attack.
All of this also casts doubt on Ms Ghahraman's claims about bombs, sirens and children her age who stopped talking from shell shock and her related claims.
In the NZ Herald, Ms Ghahraman is reported as talking about a friend’s cousin who wrote graffiti on a wall and “then he was gone”. She links this to people being disappeared by the regime and ending up in unmarked graves.
Again, the information about this claim is vague. She does not name this person, when this occurred, what was the graffiti, whether she actually saw this person writing graffiti or another source of information, why she thinks he “disappeared”, and whether he was caught writing graffiti or this claimed disappearance occurred at a later date. As this occurred sometime between 1981 and 1990, at most when she was 9 years old, there is no evidence as to why she remembers this and makes the connection to politics and the regime. This claim does not stand up to scrutiny.
In the NZ Herald article, it states that “The fighting stopped when she was eight”. As the war finished in August 1988, and she was born in 1981, Ms Ghahraman would have been 6 or 7 years old. It is an obvious error and one she could have asked the journalist to correct. If she was only 6 years old in August 1988, this would cast doubt on her ability to remember in such detail all the claimed events of war and persecution. The claim that she was 8 years old at the end of the war and failure to correct the record, casts doubt on her credibility.
Ms Ghahraman makes much of the claim that she is a refugee. In her Maiden Speech to the Parliament she said: "I never intended to run as the first ever refugee MP but I quickly realised that my face and my story mean so much to so many, so my fear of tokenism dissipated."
And: "When that repression got too scary, my family and I fled."
The claim that she is a “refugee” does not stand up to scrutiny, based on media reports and human rights and other reports on Iran. Her vague claims about the repression of the regime are not consistent with human rights reports on Iran because the regime was repressive from the beginning in 1979, not just in 1990. After the Islamic Revolution, thousands were imprisoned and executed because of their association with the Shah or his government. 
Entrants to university were carefully scrutinised to ensure no student or their family harboured opposition to the regime.
The claim of Ms Ghahraman is all the more shocking because hundreds of thousands have been killed, imprisoned and tortured since the Islamic Revolution in January 1979. About 3 million fled the regime and mostly went to Europe, USA, Canada and Australia. Opponents of the regime do not dare return to Iran, even for a visit. The regime had death squads operating in Europe in the 1980s and 1990s and there is evidence they have restarted. This is a regime which hunts down and kills and maims opponents, even after they have fled the country.
The claim to be a refugee from Iran is a significant claim, historically and morally. Too many people have been tortured, executed or forced to flee for their lives for anyone to claim this status without justification. Unlike her and her parents who left by plane, many escaped in dangerous journeys over the mountains to Turkey or across the border into Iraq. Many died or were killed in the attempt. 
I first represented Iranian refugees in 1994 in their application for refugee status in Australia, and have being doing so up until the present. I have listened to many stories of torture, persecution and escape. I have read the human rights reports and gone through pages and pages of reports with the photos of those executed. Between July 2010 and June 2015, as a Member of the Refugee Review Tribunal, I conducted hearings with Iranians who had applied for a protection visa and been refused by the Department of Immigration, and made decisions giving detailed reasons. 
Ms Ghahraman has described in the NZ Herald and Stuff online how her parents supported the Islamic Revolution, like many people at that time from all sides of politics who came together to oppose the Shah. She says that father was an agricultural engineer, working for the Ministry of Agriculture. She says he was undertaking research in developing alternative fuel sources. She says her mother was admitted to university after the Islamic Revolution and graduated. She described how she left Iran, with an orderly departure at an airport. The family was issued with passports, given permission to leave the country and allowed to take a holiday in Malaysia. The regime had a watch list to stop opponents obtaining passports and departing from an airport. 
This indicates that Ms Ghahraman’s family were viewed by the regime as their supporters. Her father was undertaking strategic research. That he was allowed to travel outside Iran with his family, indicates he was trusted to return. He would only have been given these benefits if he was either a supporter of the regime or harboured no indications of opposition to them. All government workplaces had monitoring units to ensure adherence to the principles of the Islamic Revolution. The issuing of passports, permission to leave for a holiday and an orderly departure, is not consistent with people who were persecuted by the regime.
Ms Ghahraman claimed that they had to leave their house but not that it was confiscated. The regime has made billions of dollars in confiscating the property of those who fled by falsely registering title deeds transferring the property to themselves: Reuters, 11November 2013.  This indicates they were not viewed as opponents of the regime, otherwise the house would have been stolen by the regime.
Ms Ghahraman is not a refugee or a “child asylum seeker”: Green lawyer hopes to be first refugee to win a seat in Parliament. Her claims of war and persecution do not stand up to scrutiny. Her claim to be a “refugee” is disrespectful to the victims of the regime and the millions of Iranians forced to leave the country under threat of torture and death. She is the child of parents who, like all migrants, wanted a better future for their children, especially as she was approaching the years of high school and university. They made the right choice because Ms Ghahraman has had access to education and other benefits not available to her, had they stayed in Iran.

Saturday, 21 July 2018

The MacDoctor's guide to feminism


1. No-brainer Feminism
You believe that all women and men are equal participants in society. While there are differences between men and women, these differences are an essential part of a successful society and should be celebrated. These Feminists are normal.
2. Small brain Feminism
You believe all genders are identical in every way except that all women are victims and men are the problem. Society will only be right when women are in control. These Feminists are tragic.
3. Brain dead Feminism
You believe only females count as people. Men who identify as females also count but you are a bit confused about them. All the problems in society, including your personal ones, are cause by those evil Proto-rapists, men. Therefore, you hate all men, but particularly white, old ones who remind you of your father, the creep. All of them should die, or, if you are a pacifist, be imprisoned. For some reason, you tolerate Muslim males. Weird.
These Feminists are, of course, crazy. 

 What can I say?

Monday, 16 July 2018

Reflections on Trump-A WO post I want to keep.



Clearly I haven't been here for a while but this is an excellent article on Whale Oil Beef Hooked that I want to be able to find so here it is...click the link for a good read

Tuesday, 1 August 2017

Labour Has a New Leader

Jacinda Adern, someone that has never held a real job or been elected to anything other than NGO position and finally parliament after being given a seat to stand in that even a corpse could win so long as it had a red rosette on it is now running for the position of Prime Minister of New Zealand after being elected as Labour Party Leader in a bloodless coup when the last one knifed himself in the throat seven weeks out from the election.

How awesome....NOT!
NZ  needs a strong opposition not a weak self serving liberal gaggle of gays.

When grilled about her experience and ability she took to embellishing the facts.

Asked if she had the ability to lead a government that included the Green Party and New Zealand First, she shot back: "I used to be the president of an international youth organisation that had members from Lebanon, Palestine and Israel. I think I can do this."
Out of Her Depth

She probably should have mentioned that she was elected in 2008 to the openly Communist youth group NGO and also chucked it in and returned to NZ in 2008

All in all Jacinda has never done a thing except languish in the trough.


This is going to be painfully hilarious.



Sunday, 30 July 2017

I don't usually support Auckland Transport but....

This lot do my head in. Typical elite wankers that think the whole city should get out of their way so they can pick up the little precious ones.


Arrogant twat gets TWO tickets and whines about it
"Nigel King, a real estate agent, was fined $60 for parking on a yellow line outside Ponsonby School in Curran St, and another $40 after he turned around and parked over a driveway across the road.
He said he was in the car the whole time, with the engine running, until his 9-year-old son came out of school.
"They have two people there taking photos," he said."If I had tried to park [legally but further away], that would have taken me 10 minutes, and maybe five minutes to get back to the school, so my kid would have been waiting outside for 15 minutes."
Seriously?
Here's a clue. Traffic is stuffed in Auckland and a lot of the reason is because you can't get it through your thick heads that it's not only OK for kids to walk to school with their friends it's good fun.
They really don't need you to hold their hands.


Sunday, 25 June 2017

Simon Sinek on Millennials in the Workplace

Couples Dog Shot Dead

These people don't understand why someone would shoot their dog.

Well here's a clue
"We just can't comprehend how someone could do something like that to a dog that's sitting behind a fence not doing anything.
"He did have quite a good bark on him but all he does is just want to play. He just loves doing stuff with people. If someone came up to the fence he'd just be like 'ooh yay, a pat' because often people would walk past and pat him or something."
People loath barking dogs and they loath insular twats that occupy their only little spot in the world and couldn't give a rats ass about anyone else.
What you think of as cute and playful the mother with a new baby trying to sleep thinks of as inconsiderate rude and downright mean.

I've got sweet FA in the way of sympathy for Max. 


Friday, 16 June 2017

Beer Deaths-Utter Tragedy's

It's criminal how stupid some people are and the things they do!

Just watch it unfold with a hilarious albeit tad profane commentary..


New York Times forced to correct editorial after Scalise shooting

Correction: June 16, 2017

An editorial on Thursday about the shooting of Representative Steve Scalise incorrectly stated that a link existed between political rhetoric and the 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords. In fact, no such link was established. The editorial also incorrectly described a map distributed by a political action committee before that shooting. It depicted electoral districts, not individual Democratic lawmakers, beneath stylized cross hairs.

The entire editorial with the correction is here 


They really are totally bankrupt of any journalistic morals.

Sunday, 30 April 2017

Two big reasons my generation hates free speech


An excellent piece of work from Rebel Media and their man that was vilified as a racist white supremacist, (well he might be...but he's not white....sooooooo) and a fascist by a white chick that clearly doesn't know that Hitler was a socialist.

Worth a watch.


Monday, 17 April 2017

Huffington Post Takes Down White Man Hating Post Because...

Not because it was a shameless piece of white man hating, click bait, racist, sexist twaddle or because of the virulent backlash they received but because it's author wasn't verified.

The reply I sent them through their Contact Us button
Yeah Right!

These people are shameless in their belief that they are the bastion of hope and truth and that everyone else is wrong.
The quote below is from their press release.



"The Huffington Post South Africa has received an onslaught of messages and comments from those angered by the blog, particularly via our email address inviting corrections from our readers. Here is a small sample:
1.      “I see a correction needs to be made on this article! The entire thing is misogynistic and also racist. If you could clear that up for me, that would be great.”
2.      “Congrats Huffingtonpost! You are now Officially the most racist website online! It was hard work, but just look at you now! PS Race is a social construct.”
3.      “Delete this article and fire this self-hating racist.”
4.      “Here’s a correction. Delete your entire website. You absolute psychopaths.”
5.      “Lets do an experiment: 1 – copy this article in MS word 2- Hit “Ctrl+R” and replace “White men” with any other group, gender or ethnic background. 3 – Read the article again…Are you offended? If you are, why are you printing this garbage?”
6.      “This article is racist towards white men. How can you allow this trash on your site? I’ve lost respect for huffpost, sorry, you are no categorized as junk along with the rest of the SJW trash that seems to persist on the internet.”
7.      “I think your editor meant to place this in the satire section or your local equivalent.” Otherwise – and I say this as a person sympathetic to progressive political causes – I suggest they take a long, hard look in the mirror and ask themselves “What the fuck is wrong with you?”
8.      “White monopoly? Tell it to the ancient Egyptians, ancient Chinese. Get OVER yourselves. Want more, black folk? WORK HARDER! Come up with your OWN economic system. Stop the “mouth crap” and build a better FvKKinq mousetrap.”
9.      “Suck my balls. The world owes you nothing.”
And that’s not the worst of it. We’ve excluded the overtly racist, sexist and violent comments that are quickly gathering in our inboxes.
Garland’s underlying analysis about the uneven distribution of wealth and power in the world is pretty standard for feminist theory. It has been espoused in many different ways by feminist writers and theorists for decades now. In that sense, there was nothing in the article that should have shocked or surprised anybody (or so we thought.)
It would appear that perhaps much of the outcry derives from a very poor reading of the article — or perhaps none at all. Dismantling the patriarchal systems that have brought us to where we are today, a world where power is wielded to dangerous and destructive ends by men, and in particular white men, necessarily means a loss of power to those who hold it. A loss of oppressive power. Those who have held undue power granted to them by patriarchy must lose it for us to be truly equal. This seems blindingly obvious to us…"

And now they snivel because the world rebelled at the hypocrisy shown by posting it in the first place and they don't like it.
Long may it continue.

Wednesday, 15 March 2017

Sons of Anarchy

Watched this series a few months ago in a sort of mini binge. Saw a comment on Gab.AI and it reminded me of my roundup comment re the series...this is it
"You can tell some chick is involved in this, they've turned some of the greatest rock music of all time into sappy fucking simpering ballads, and it’s enough to make a man puke!
In all the years and all the gangs I've bumped up against from time to time, such as the Mongrel Mob, Black Power, Gypsy Jokers and the Finks, Southern Vikings, Headhunters and Nomads, I've never seen or heard of all this fucking man love and I have never FUCKING ever seen one of them kiss another. EVER!
Written by fags, chicks and wannabe's."
 The comment refers to gangs in two countries from a time when I was young and even more stupid than I am now and had a tendency to go places smarter people avoided.



Different days.